| 76 | 0 | 42 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对锂离子电池负极连接片多层结构工艺复杂、成本高的问题,本文提出单层结构优化方案,通过硬度调控提升工艺适配性。设计了三种硬度区间(35.2~36.3 HV、36.6~37.9 HV、38.1~40.2 HV)的单层连接片,经产线验证优选出最佳硬度范围,并从焊接质量、短路率、交流内阻、倍率充放电性能、温升特性以及振动可靠性等维度进行系统性实验评估,与多层结构历史数据对比分析。结果表明:硬度36.6~37.9 HV的单层连接片超声波焊接后形态稳定,整形工序不良率由多层结构的约4.5%~6%降至1.2%;超声波焊接焊印残留率达100%,激光焊接有效熔深、有效熔宽平均值分别为0.415 mm和1.204 mm,基材本体及焊线载流能力均满足230 A过流能力的设计要求,剥离测试表现为母材断裂,焊线强度高于母材本身;归因于连接片的短路率稳定控制在≤0.11%,较多层结构降低约50%;单层结构电池交流内阻(ACR)均值(0.2939 mΩ)与多层结构(0.2935 mΩ)基本持平(P=0.343),倍率充放电容量保持率≥99.4%,温升特性相当,振动测试过程中电压与温度均无异常波动,连接可靠性良好。该方案简化工艺、降低成本,关键产线指标优于多层结构,为锂离子电池连接片的结构优化提供了工程参考。
Abstract:To address the issues of complex manufacturing process and high cost of multi-layer negative electrode tabs in lithium-ion batteries, this paper proposes a single-layer structural optimization scheme that enhances process adaptability through hardness control. Three hardness ranges (35.2–36.3 HV, 36.6–37.9 HV, and 38.1–40.2 HV) of single-layer tabs were designed, and the optimal hardness range was selected through production line validation. The optimized scheme was systematically evaluated in terms of welding quality, short circuit rate, alternating current internal resistance (ACR), rate charge–discharge performance, temperature rise characteristics, and vibration reliability with comparative analysis against historical data of multi-layer structures. The results indicate that single-layer tabs with a hardness of 36.6–37.9 HV exhibit stable morphology after ultrasonic welding, and the shaping process defect rate decreased from approximately 4.5%–6% (multi-layer structure) to 1.2%. The ultrasonic welding mark retention rate reached 100%, and the average effective penetration depth and width of laser welding were 0.415 mm and 1.204 mm, respectively, meeting the design requirement of 230 A current-carrying capacity for both the base metal and the weld line. The peel test exhibited base metal fracture, indicating that the weld strength is higher than that of the base metal itself. The short circuit rate attributable to the tab itself was stably controlled at ≤0.11%, representing a reduction of approximately 50% compared with the multi-layer structure. The mean ACR of the single-layer structure (0.2939 mΩ) was comparable to that of the multi-layer structure (0.2935 mΩ) with no significant difference (P=0.343). The optimized cells achieved a capacity retention rate of ≥99.4% in rate charge–discharge tests, with temperature rise characteristics comparable to those of the multi-layer structure. During vibration testing, no abnormal fluctuations in voltage and temperature were observed, demonstrating good connection reliability. This scheme simplifies the manufacturing process, reduces costs, and outperforms the multi-layer structure in key production line indicators, providing an engineering reference for the structural optimization of lithium-ion battery tabs.
[1] 谢绍基.新能源材料在新能源汽车领域的应用探析[J].时代汽车,2025(20):117-119.
[2] 杨绍斌,梁正.锂离子电池制造工艺原理与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2020.
[3] 陆巍巍,陈晨曦,徐港来,等.动力电池连接片激光焊接虚焊原因分析与改善[J].机械制造文摘(焊接分册),2024(2):19-23.
[4] 李元轶,林文稳,汪梓迅,等.高性能铜加工材料在新能源汽车领域研究现状及趋势分析[J].铜业工程,2025(6):85-109.
[5] 胡晓雄,王军,刘丽荣.动力电池负极集流体的焊接参数响应面优化方法[J].汽车工艺与材料,2026(6):31-39.
[6] 余抒阳,罗文雷,解晶莹,等.锂离子电池释热机理与模型及安全改性技术研究综述[J].化学进展,2023,35(4):620-642.
[7] 宋岚,熊若愚,宋华雄,等.锂离子电池多尺度非均匀性概述[J].储能科学与技术,2022,11(2):487-502.
[8] 郑涵今,薛健,吕科,等.基于X-Ray图像的锂电池电极检测方法[J].无线电通信技术,2023,49(3):532-540.
[9] 谈秀雯,李凌.局部过热下锂电池热失控特性及其热管理研究[J].储能科学与技术,2025,14(9):3521-3529.
[10] 李忠坡.超声波焊接质量对方形多极耳锂离子电池性能的影响[J].造纸装备及材料,2025,54(10):92-94.
[11] 王梦,李景康,袁天明,等.锂离子电池生产的超声波焊接工艺[J].电池,2025,55(4):684-690.
[12] 李林贺.锂电池极耳焊接对电池性能影响的研究[J].焊接技术,2018,47(5):101-102.
[13] 吴晓红.电池连接片紫铜激光焊接工艺研究[J].应用激光,2020,40(1):62-66.
[14] 刘江波.基于内阻检测的锂电池健康状态估计研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2015.
[15] 范光辉.基于多物理场耦合的锂电池组散热分析与实验研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2019.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TM912
引用信息:
[1]李慧民.锂离子电池负极连接片单层结构优化与验证[J].电池工业().
2026-09-23
2026-09-23
2026-09-23